Athlone

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1790-1820, ed. R. Thorne, 1986
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Right of Election:

in the freemen

Number of voters:

about 500 in 1784, 71 in 1832

Population:

(1821): 7,543

Elections

DateCandidate
1801WILLIAM HANDCOCK
26 July 1803WILLIAM HANDCOCK
22 Aug. 1803 THOMAS JONES vice Handcock, vacated his seat
13 Nov. 1806GEORGE TIERNEY
25 May 1807HON. HENRY WELLESLEY
31 July 1807 JOHN FREWEN TURNER vice Wellesley, chose to sit for Eye
23 Oct. 1812JOHN WILSON CROKER
30 June 1818JOHN GORDON

Main Article

William Handcock, who had represented the borough on his family interest since 1783, became sole proprietor at the Union, after buying out Sir Richard Bligh St. George, 2nd Bt., whose family had returned the other Member previously and had opposed the Union.1 He requested sole patronage of Athlone from government in 1801, claiming that the corporation ‘belonged’ to him, and subsequently he referred to it as ‘exclusively mine’.2 In August 1803 he ceased to represent it himself and sold it to government, though in 1806, 1807 and 1812 he threatened to return himself to get a better bargain. Thus in 1806 the Grenville ministry had to fork out £5,000, £1,000 more than they had intended, when Handcock claimed that he had been offered that sum by Alexander Davison the jobbing contractor and that he was impatient for his money.3 In 1807 the Castle was kept on tenterhooks and Handcock claimed to have thwarted an opposition to the chief secretary’s brother, his nominee, by a ‘troublesome fellow’ named Hearne, ‘last winter confined in the Birmingham Tower’.4 The chief secretary reported a ‘trifling opposition’. In 1812 Handcock was indignant at the delay in granting him an Irish peerage but, on being reassured, returned Croker as a ‘free gift’.5 In 1815 the Castle was to some extent discouraged from substituting another friend for Croker at Athlone by the fear that they could not satisfy Handcock’s wishes for county honours to add to his peerage of Castlemaine; but they seem to have placated him by making him a governor of the county, by which time the reshuffle of seats was no longer necessary. This was as well, as the Castle was embarrassed by the English government’s insistence on nominating to any vacancy at Athlone at this juncture.6

Author: P. J. Jupp

Notes

  • 1. PRO 30/9/13, pt. 2, Irish borough list.
  • 2. Add. 35729, f. 71; Wellington mss, Handcock to Wellesley, 15 Mar. 1808.
  • 3. HMC Fortescue, viii. 399, 409; NLS mss 12918, Elliot to Fremantle, 3, 8 Nov., replies 5, 10 Nov. 1806.
  • 4. Wellington Supp. Despatches, v. 17, 18, 23, 28, 48-49, 64-65; Wellington mss, Handcock to Wellesley, 29 May 1807.
  • 5. Add. 40280, ff. 35, 41, 48, 64, 82.
  • 6. Add. 40288, ff. 27, 43, 46.