Co. Fermanagh

County

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1790-1820, ed. R. Thorne, 1986
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Number of voters:

about 7,000 in 1815

Elections

DateCandidateVotes
1801MERVYN ARCHDALL I 
 JOHN WILLOUGHBY COLE, Visct. Cole 
19 July 1802JOHN WILLOUGHBY COLE, Visct. Cole 
 MERVYN ARCHDALL II 
17 June 1803 HON. GALBRAITH LOWRY COLE vice Cole, become a peer of Ireland 
17 Nov. 1806HON. GALBRAITH LOWRY COLE1416
 MERVYN ARCHDALL II1260
 Henry Brooke623
 Richard Brooke413
27 May 1807HON. GALBRAITH LOWRY COLE949
 MERVYN ARCHDALL II513
 Henry Brooke447
9 Nov. 1812HON. GALBRAITH LOWRY COLE3432
 MERVYN ARCHDALL II2066
 Henry Brooke1852
2 July 1818SIR GALBRAITH LOWRY COLE 
 MERVYN ARCHDALL II 

Main Article

Fermanagh was a largely agricultural county, populated almost equally by Catholics and Protestants. Elections were traditionally dominated by the most substantial landowners Lord Enniskillen (Cole), the Archdalls and the Brookes of Brookeborough. In fact, an Archdall and a Cole had represented the county continuously since 1731 and 1783 respectively, and a Brooke between those dates. Not surprisingly, the main feature of elections after the Union was the three attempts of Henry Brooke to recapture a county seat. The other landlords, notably the Marquess of Ely, Lord Belmore and Sir James Caldwell, counted for little.1

Henry Brooke made his first effective bid in 1806 when he and his relation Richard Brooke stood against Generals Archdall and Cole, who had united to thwart him in 1802. The Castle adopted a policy of neutrality and Brooke had therefore to rely largely upon the following claims on his behalf:

He possesses an enlightened mind and liberal sentiments. He is a good and a resident landlord, and spends an ample fortune in the bosom of his tenantry ... He has the most flourishing estate in the county; the tenants have good houses, are well clad; there are few who cannot ride a good horse to market, and many whom he is not ashamed to have at his table. A few such landlords would be serviceable in Ireland.

They were insufficient to defeat his rivals’ tenant strength and Archdall could be outspoken against government on the hustings.2

This contest was repeated in 1807 and 1812. On both occasions, the Castle did little or nothing and Lord Ely’s support of Brooke proved unavailing. In fact the only significant event was the decision of the returning officer in 1807 that freeholders were entitled to vote after 12 lunar rather than calendar months from the date of their registration. Brooke claimed that this created 295 of his opponents.3 In 1818 Cole and Archdall were unopposed, the former strenuously denying throughout that there was any coalition between them. This was probably correct, though both gave a general support to administration and strongly opposed Catholic relief.4

Author: P. J. Jupp

Notes

  • 1. Wakefield, Account of Ireland, i. 259.
  • 2. M. L. Cole and S. Gwynn, Mems. of Sir Lowry Cole, 25; Spencer mss, Irish list, May 1806; Dublin Evening Post, 11 Nov. 1806.
  • 3. Wellington mss, Archdall to Wellesley, 12 May, reply 15 May; Dublin Corresp. 27 May 1807; Add. 40204, f. 7.
  • 4. Dublin Corresp. 3 July 1818.