Available from Boydell and Brewer
Right of Election:
in the corporation and freemen
Number of Qualified Electors:
Number of voters:
|24 Feb. 1690||Edward Seymour|
|25 Oct. 1695||James Kendall|
|1 Aug. 1698||James Kendall|
|11 Jan. 1701||James Kendall|
|2 Dec. 1701||Richard Jones, Earl of Ranelagh [I]|
|28 July 1702||Richard Jones, Earl of Ranelagh [I]|
|3 Dec. 1702||Richard Hele vice Godolphin, chose to sit for Helston|
|31 Mar. 1703||Henry Poley vice Hele, chose to sit for Plympton Erle|
|Charles Seymour vice Ranelagh, expelled|
|22 May 1705||Sir Charles Hedges|
|23 Jan. 1707||Francis Palmes vice Mountstephen, deceased|
|15 May 1708||Sir Charles Hedges|
|19 Oct. 1710||Sir Charles Hedges|
|20 Apr. 17131||John Trelawny vice Maynwaring, deceased|
|7 Sept. 1713||John Trelawny|
|Sir Charles Wager|
The dominant political influence at West Looe was Sir Jonathan Trelawny, 3rd Bt., bishop of Exeter and then, from 1707, of Winchester (see East Looe, Cornw.). The corporation at West Looe consisted of a mayor and 12 aldermen which was easily overawed. The only alternative interest to the Trelawnys was held by the Kendall family. James Kendall controlled the interest by virtue of his guardianship over his niece Mary (grand-daughter of Thomas Kendall†, who had acquired nearby Killigarth by marriage). Kendall, a wealthy West Indian merchant, did not stand in 1690 and spent the next few years abroad. In his absence Edward Seymour, eldest son of Sir Edward, 4th Bt.* (a cousin of the bishop), was chosen with Jonathan Trelawny of Plymouth, also a cousin of the bishop. In 1695 Kendall was chosen with John Mountstephen, a Cornish Tory and a protégé of the bishop, and both men retained their seats at the next two elections. In January 1701 the bishop explicitly recorded that he had nominated to both seats. In December 1701 Kendall’s partner was the Earl of Ranelagh, whose daughter, Lady Catherine Jones, was the closest friend of Mary Kendall.2
At the general election following the accession of Queen Anne, Ranelagh’s precarious parliamentary position was shored up by the new ministry. Sir Edward Seymour wrote to Lord Nottingham (Daniel Finch†): ‘my Lord Treasurer [Sidney Godolphin†], Lord Marlborough [John Churchill†], Lord Rochester [Laurence Hyde†] have pressed the bishop of Exeter for choosing of my Lord Ranelagh but I shall spoil that plot’. Seymour was foiled by Bishop Trelawny, who grew steadily closer to the ‘duumvirs’, aided no doubt by Mary Kendall, who had fallen out with her uncle. Ranelagh was chosen with Sidney Godolphin, the lord treasurer’s kinsman. When Godolphin opted to sit for Helston, Richard Hele, a Devonian relation of the Trelawnys, was chosen to replace him. Hele was seated on petition for Plympton Erle and he too resigned his seat, being replaced by Henry Poley, an eminent lawyer and a High Tory recommended by Godolphin. Simultaneously, Charles Seymour, Sir Edward’s youngest son, replaced Ranelagh, who had been expelled. The rapid turnover of Members through resignation suggests that this was a borough in which the main interest was firmly in control. Such a view is confirmed by the mayor of West Looe who, about this time, undertook to make no freemen or aldermen without ‘a positive command’ from the bishop nor to draw up any petition without his approval, in return for financial assistance for this ‘poor corporation with little land worth anything’. In 1705 Bishop Trelawny returned Sir Charles Hedges, secretary of state, along with Mountstephen. Upon Mountstephen’s death, Francis Palmes, one of Marlborough’s favourite army officers, was chosen. In 1708 John Conyers, the late chairman of ways and means, replaced Palmes. Five new freemen were made at West Looe in 1709–10, in an irregular manner, it was later alleged. By this time virtually all freemen were non-resident, including ‘one doctor of theology, one doctor of medicine, one colonel, one admiral and numerous clergy’.3
At the election after the fall of Godolphin in 1710, Bishop Trelawny returned Arthur Maynwaring, the Whig pamphleteer, with Hedges. This went against the Tory tide, although the new ministry was soon courting Bishop Trelawny for his electoral interest. That Trelawny, who after all was a Tory, should at least have wished to maintain good relations with the Harley ministry, can be seen in the supportive addresses sent from both East and West Looe in October 1712 following the Queen’s communication of the peace terms to the Commons. However, in the by-election following Maynwaring’s death, there was a break with recent practice, Bishop Trelawny returning not a politician recommended by the ministry, but his own son, John II, who had recently come of age. In 1713 John Trelawny was joined by the Whig admiral, Sir Charles Wager, who was reputed to be a native of the borough and who had recently purchased an estate in the vicinity. In the 1715 campaign Thomas Carte, the Jacobite historian, deemed the bishop ‘very unaccountable’ for choosing four Whigs at Looe.4
Authors: Eveline Cruickshanks / Stuart Handley
- 1. 7 May on return, ex inf. James Derriman.
- 2. Bodl. Willis 48, f. 139v; Devon RO, Exeter dioc. archs., Bp. Trelawny to Adn. Cook, 11 Jan. ; Westminster Abbey Reg. (Harl. Soc. Reg. x), 267.
- 3. Add. 29588, f. 79; HMC Bath, i. 57; A.L. Browne, Corp. Chrons. 194–5; PRO, KB1/45(2), 47(1), ex inf. James Derriman.
- 4. London Gazette, 30 Sept.–4 Oct. 1712; Polsue, Complete Paroch. Hist. Cornw. iii. 164–5; Bodl. Ballard 18, ff. 71–72.